Two months ago, I recorded the briefing you’re about to watch. Back then, U.S.–Iran tensions were simmering; today, we’re two weeks deep into open conflict—U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Iranian retaliation across the region, and a global audience searching for clarity. While the technology and headlines have changed, the underlying logic is as old as the empires that once fought for dominance in these same lands.
What’s new—and what’s unchanged:
Escalation remains tactical, not existential.
Despite drone swarms, missile salvos, and cyber skirmishes, neither Washington nor Tehran appears willing to risk all-out war. Each side is probing, maneuvering for leverage and deterrence, not destruction. This is classic power politics: escalate just enough to shape outcomes, never enough to trigger collapse.
Russia’s hand: the “Byzantine” playbook.
Moscow has publicly condemned U.S. strikes as “unjustified” and signaled diplomatic support for Tehran, but so far, it’s drawn a clear line against direct military involvement (Reuters). Putin has offered to mediate between Iran and Israel, leveraging Russia’s regional connections for influence without entanglement (AP News). The recent Russia–Iran strategic partnership treaty is strong on paper but doesn’t bind either side to mutual defense (Wikipedia). This is pure Byzantine maneuver: profit from the fog, avoid the frontline.
Proxy warfare defines the battlefield.
Iran’s network—Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iraqi militias—are carrying the fight. Their actions drain U.S. resources, create headaches for allies, and keep escalation below the “red line.” Washington responds with targeted force, but both sides are signaling caution. The war is everywhere, but nowhere total.
Domestic pressure: a slow, grinding front.
In Iran, nationalist fervor is high, but the economic cost is mounting. Sanctions bite harder as fighting continues. In the U.S., every escalation becomes partisan fuel, and political unity is as fragile as ever. The lesson from history: great powers weaken from within, even as they strike outward.
The ancient cycle persists.
What you’ll see in the original briefing is more relevant than ever. The world’s major powers are running the same scripts as their ancestors: Persia resists, Greece (the West) presses, Byzantium (Russia) maneuvers in the background. The tools have changed, but not the ambitions or anxieties.
Bottom line:
Russia is shaping outcomes with diplomacy, not tanks—acting as a broker, not a belligerent. The U.S. and Iran are testing each other’s endurance, not seeking annihilation. If you want to anticipate the next moves, study the patterns, not just the headlines.
Watch the briefing for a deeper strategic breakdown. And let me know in the comments: which dynamic matters most to you—Russia’s calculated restraint, Iran’s proxies, or the economic grind facing both sides? And be sure to checkout youtube.com/@richholt
Sources: Reuters, AP News, Washington Post, Wikipedia (see links above for direct reports on Russian activity and treaty details).
Share this post